National Certificate: Environmental Practice
- Description
- Curriculum
- Reviews
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Purpose:
This qualification is the third in a series for practitioners in the field of environmental science, environmental management and waste management. This series of qualifications will equip practitioners with the skills, knowledge and values to contribute towards the wise and effective use and management of our natural resources and ecological systems. The specific purpose of this qualification represents the skills, knowledge and understanding required by competent practitioners to:
|
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| It is assumed that the learner is competent in Communication and Mathematical Literacy at NQF level 2.
Recognition of prior learning: This qualification may be obtained through the process of RPL. The learner should be thoroughly briefed prior to the assessment and support should be provided to assist the learner in the process of developing a portfolio. While this is primarily a context-based qualification, evidence from other areas of endeavour may be introduced if pertinent to any of the Exit Level Outcomes. Access to this qualification is open. However, it is preferable that learners first complete the National Certificate: Environmental Practice: Level 2 or equivalent before accessing this qualification. The learner will need access to suitable specialised vehicles and/or complex machinery and equipment. |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| All Fundamental (40) credits and Core (70) credits are compulsory. Then a learner has to chose 12 elective credits from the elective component to make up the minimum required credits of 122. If a learner selects First Aid as an elective all 3 first aid standards should be done. |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| The Exit Level Outcomes for this qualification reflect a combination of Specific Outcomes and Critical Cross-Field Education and Training Outcomes. The way in which the Critical Cross-Field Outcomes have been advanced through the learning required for this qualification is embedded in the way in which the unit standards have been constructed. Critical Cross-Field Outcomes form the basis for acquiring skills, knowledge and values. The application of these in a specific context results in the achievement of Specific Outcomes. The integration of Specific Outcomes from a variety of unit standards results in the ability to achieve the Exit Level Outcomes.
Exit level outcome 1
|
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
Assessment criteria associated with Exit level outcome 1
|
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| Qualifications which are directly comparable with this one in terms of level and scope have not been identified. The fact that this is a generic qualification that must serve the diverse needs of the broad field of environmental science, environmental management and waste management, puts it in a class of its own.
Internationally, qualifications related to environmental science and environmental management fall into the sphere of higher education, apart from a few isolated examples at supervisory and first-tier management level. At the level of this qualification, there are a limited number of qualifications which focus on waste management, such as the Scottish Vocational Qualifications and the National Vocational Qualifications of England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The approach taken in these qualifications aligns broadly with the approach taken here: qualifications are standards-based, learning is workplace-based, assessment is observation- and portfolio-based, and skills and knowledge are acquired, practiced and assessed within contexts relevant to the learner. However, this (i.e. the South African) qualification places a greater requirement on the learner to demonstrate successful integration of the knowledge and skills acquired. A recent development has been the initiative by the International Solid Waste Association to develop qualifications and promote training internationally. Developments are also taking place in other parts of the world, notably South America. However, concrete information of the type needed to carry out a detailed comparison could not be found within the limits of the research capability. Internationally, the method most widely used by organisations and companies to develop the skills of lower level employees is that of in-house orientation or training for a specific job. Information obtained by SGB members through personal contacts with colleagues in other countries has indicated that internships may also be used to develop skills, particularly in the United Kingdom. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) is regarded as representing best practice in environmental matters and is used as a model by other countries. In addition to its role in protecting the environment within the United States, the US EPA is also influential in skills development in the environmental field within the United States and in the many countries outside of the United States. The US EPA is instrumental in promoting the development of skills at all levels. It sets standards, establishes guidelines, provides funding and support for the development of resources and provision of training, and promotes the sharing and acquisition of knowledge through conferences, workshops and specialised training. The absence of concrete information means that a detailed comparison cannot be made between US EPA training and the learning required for this qualification. However, it is known, through SGB members’ personal experience and knowledge of learning resources which meet US EPA standards (for example, in the field of waste management), that the skills, knowledge and values that would be achieved through this qualification are of a comparable standard to those determined by the US EPA. Collectively, the SGB has close links with professional bodies and educational institutions which maintain links with their counterparts on an international level. This awareness of international trends in environmental practice and in environmental education has enabled the SGB to determine a realistic standard for this qualification and its associated unit standards, while at the same time enabling people to extend themselves within the learning context of this qualification. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification articulates with the National Certificate in Environmental Practice: NQF 4.
This qualification has been designed and structured so that qualifying learners can move from one context to another. Employers or institutions should be able to evaluate the outcomes of this qualification against the needs of their context and structure top-up learning appropriately. Equally, holders of other qualifications may be evaluated against this qualification for the purpose of RPL. This qualification has been designed as a generic qualification which will serve the diverse needs of the field of environmental science, environmental management and waste management. While a certain amount of the learning is applicable across the field, the balance will be related to the learner’s context. Each context will have a different focus and this will determine what qualifications, both horizontally and vertically, will articulate with this one. |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
|
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
The following criteria should be applied by the relevant ETQA:
|
| REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
| As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this qualification was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
| MORE INFO |
| 49752 |